---

The Mahatma Letters to A.P. Sinnett - 1923

By A. T. Barker

---

Letter No XXIIIa

(i)    The latter end of a very important cycle. Each Round, each ring, as every race has its great and its smaller cycles, on every planet that mankind passes through.
Our fourth Round Humanity has its one great cycle, and so have her races and sub-races. The ** curious rush " is due to the double effect of the former—the beginning of its downward course;—and of the latter (the small cycle of your '* sub-race ") running on to its apex. Remember, you belong to the fifth Race, yet you are but a Western siib-rsice. Notwithstanding your efi^orts, what you call civilization is confined only to the latter and its off-shoots in America. Radiating around, its deceptive light may seem to throw its rays on a greater distance than it does on reality. —There is no ** rush " in China, and of Japan you make but a caricature.

A student of occultism ought not to speak of the " stagnant condition of the fourth Race people " since history knows next to nothing of that condition ** up to the beginning of modern pro- gress " of other nations but the Western. What do you know of America, for instance, before the invasion of that country by the Spaniards? Less than two centuries prior to the arrival of Cortez there was as great a " rush " towards progress among the sub-races of Peru and Mexico as there is now in Europe and the U.S.A. Their sub-race ended in nearly total annihilation through causes generated by itself ; so will yours at the end of its cycle. We may speak only of the " stagnant condition " into which, following the law of development, growth, maturity and decline every race and sub-race falls into during its transition period. It is that latter condition your Universal History is acquainted with, while it remains superbly ignorant of the condition even India was in, some ten centuries back. Your sub races are now running to.wards the apex of their respective cycles,and that History goes no further back than the periods of declineof a few other sub-races belonging most of them to the precedingfourth Race. And what is the area and the period of time embraced by its Universal eye?—At the utmost stretch—a few,miserable dozens of centuries. A mighty horizon, indeed ! Beyond—all is darkness for it, nothing but hypotheses.

(2) No doubt there was. Egyptian and Aryan records andespecially our Zodiacal tables furnish us with every proof of it besides our inner knowledge. Civilization is an inheritance, apatrimony that passes from race to race along the ascending anddescending paths of cycles. During the minority of a sub-race,it is preserved for it by its predecessor, which disappears, dies outgenerally, when the former ' ' comes to age. ' ' At first, most ofthem squander and mismanage their property, or leave it un-touched in the ancestral coffers. They reject contemptuously theadvices of their elders and prefer, boy like playing in the streetsto studying and making the most of the untouched wealth storedup for them in the records of the Past. Thus during yourtransition period—the middle ages—Europe rejected the testimonyof Antiquity, calling such sages as Heroditus and other learnedGreeks—the Father of Lies, until she knew better and changedthe appellation into that of ** Father of History." Instead ofneglecting, you now accumulate and add to your wealth. Asevery other race you had your ups and downs, your periods ofhonour and dishonour, your dark mid-nights and—you are nowapproaching your brilliant noon. The youngest of the fifth racefamily you were for long ages the unloved and the uncared for, the Cendrillon in your home. And now, when so many of yoursisters have died ; and others still are dying, while the few of theold survivors, now in their second infancy, wait but for theirMessiah—the sixth race—to resurrect to a new life and start anewwith the coming stronger along the path of a new cycle—now thatthe Western Cendrillon has suddenly developed into a proudwealthy Princess, the beauty we all see and admire—how does sheact? Less kind hearted than the Princess in the tale, instead ofoffering to her elder and less favoured sister, the oldest now, in fact since she is nearly " a million years old " and the only onewho has never treated her unkindly, though she may haveignored her, —instead of offering her, I say, the ** Kiss of peace "she applies to her the lex taleonis with a vengeance that does notenhance her natural beauty. This, my good friend, and brother,is not a far-stretched allegory but—history.

(3) Yes ; the fifth race—ours—began in Asia a million yearsago. What was it about for the 998,000 years preceding the last 2,000? A pertinent question; offered moreover in quite a Christian spirit that refuses to beheve that any good could ever have come out from anywhere before and save Nazareth. What was it about? Well, it was occupying itself pretty well in the same way as it does now—craving Mr. Grant Allen's pardon, who would place our primitive ancestor the " hedgehoggy " man, in the early part of the Eocene age ! Forsooth, your scientific writers bestride their hypothesis most fearlessly, I see. It will really be pity to find their fiery steed kicking and breaking their heads some day ; something that is unavoidably in store for them. In the Eoscene age—even in its " very first part," the great cycle of the fourth Race men, the Atlanteans—had already reached its highest point, and the great continent, the father of nearly all the present continents—showed the first symptoms of sinking—a process that occupied it down to 11,446 years ago, when its last island, that, translating its vernacular name, we may call with propriety Poseidonis—went down with a crash. By the bye, whoever wrote the Review of Donnelly's Atlantis is right : Lemuria can no more be confounded with the Atlantic Continent than Europe with America. Both sunk and were drowned with their high civilization and '* Gods," yet between the two catastrophies, a short period of about 700,000 years elapsed ; ** Lemuria flourishing and ending her career just at about that trifling lapse of time before the early part of the Eocene Age, since its race was the third. Behold, the relics of that once great nation in some of the flat headed aborigines of your Australia ! No less right is their review in rejecting the kind attempt of the author to people India and Egypt with the refuse of Atlantis. No doubt your geologists are very learned ; but why not bear in mind that, under the continents explored and fathomed by them in the bowels of which they have found the ** Eocene Age " and forced it to deliver them its secrets, there may be, hidden deep in the fathomless, or rather unfathomed ocean beds, other, and far older continents whose stratums have never been geologically explored ; and that they may some day upset entirely their present theories, thus illustrating the simplicity and sublimity of truth as connected with inductive " generalization " in opposition to their visionary conjectures. Why not admit—true no one of them has ever thought of it—that our present continents, have—like ** Lemuria " and ** Atlantis "—been several times already, submerged and had the time to reappear again, and bear their new groups of mankind and civilization ; and that, at the first great geological upheaval, at the next cataclysm—in the series of periodical cataclysms that occur from the beginning to the end of the Round,—our already autopsized continents will go down, and the Lemurias and Atlantises come up again. Think of the future geologists of the sixth and seventh races. Imagine them digging deep in the bowels of what was Ceylon and Simla, and finding implements of the Veddahs, or of the remote ancestor of the civilized Pahari—everyobject of the civilized portions of humanity that inhabited thoseregions having been pulverized to dust by the great masses oftravelling glaciers, —during the next glacial period—imagine himfinding only such rude implements as now found among thosesavage tribes ; and forthwith declaring that during that periodprimitive man climbed and slept on the trees, and sucked themarrow out of animal bones after breaking them—as civilizedEuropeans no less than the Veddahs will often do—hence jumpingto the conclusion that in the year 1882 a.d., mankind was composed of " man-like animals," black-faced and whiskered, " withprominent prognathous and large pointed canine teeth." True, aGrant Allen of the sixth race, may be not so far from fact andtruth in his conjecture that during the " Simla period "—theseteeth were used in the combats of the " males " for grass widows—but then metaphora has very little to do with anthropology andgeology. Such is your Science. To return to your questions.

Of course the fourth race periods of the highest civilization,Greek and Roman, and even Egyptian civilization are nothingcompared to the civilizations that began with the third race.Those of the second were not savages but they could not be calledcivilized. And now reading one of my first letters on the races(a question first touched by M.) pray, do not accuse either him ormyself of some new contradiction. Read it over and see, that it leaves out the question of civilizations altogether and mentionsbut the degenerate remnants of the fourth and third races, andgives you as a corroboration the latest conclusions of your ownScience. Do not regard an unavoidable incompleteness as inconsistency. You now ask me a direct question, and, I answer it. Greeks and Romans were small sub-races and Egyptians part andparcel of our own " Caucasian " stock. Look at the latter andat India. Having reached the highest civilization and whatismore : learning—both went down. Egypt as a distinct sub-racedisappearing entirely (her Copts are a hybrid remnant). India—as one of the first and most powerful off-shoots of the motherRace, and composed of a number of sub-races, lasting to thesetimes, and struggling once more to take her place in historysome day. That History catches but a few stray, hazy glimpsesof Egypt, some 12,000 years back; when, having already reachedthe apex of its cycle thousands of years before, the latter hadbegun going down. What does, or can it know of India 5,000years ago, or of the Chaldees—whom it confounds most charmingly with the Assyrians, making of them one day ** Akkadians,"at another Turanians and what not? We say then, that yourHistory is entirely at sea.

We are refused by the Journal of Science—words repeated and quoted by M.A. (Oxon) with a rapture worthy of a great medium —any claim whatever for " higher knowledge.'* Says the re- viewer : " Suppose the Brothers were to say ' point your telescope to such and such a spot in heavens, and you will find a planet yet unknown to you; or dig into the earth, etc., and you will find a mineral,' etc." Very fine, indeed, and suppose that was done, what would be the result? Why a charge of plagiarism—since everything of that kind, every ** planet and mineral " that exists in space or inside the earth, are known and recorded in our books thousand of years ago ; more ; many a true hypothesis was timidly brought forward by their own scientific men and as constantly rejected by the majority with whose preconceptions it interfered. Your intention is laudable but nothing that I may give you in answer will ever be accepted from us. Whenever discovered that "it is verily so," the discovery will be attributed to him who corroborated the evidence—as in the case of Copernicus and Galileo, the latter having availed himself but of the Pythagorean MSS.

But to return to ** civilizations." Do you know that the Chaldees were at the apex of their Occult fame before what you term as the " bronze Age " ? that the " Sons of Ad " or the children of the Fire Mist preceded by hundreds of centuries the Age of Iron, which was an old age already, when what you now call the Historical Period—probably because what is known of it is generally no history but fiction—had hardly begun. We hold—but then what warrant can you give the world that we are right? —that far greater civilizations than our own have risen and decayed." It is not enough to say as some of your modern writers do—that an extinct civilization existed before Rome and Athens were founded. We affirm that a series of civilizations existed before, as well as after the Glacial Period, that they existed upon various points, of the globe, reached their apex of glory and—died. Every trace and memory had been lost of the Assyrian and Phoenicean civilizations until discoveries began to be made a few years ago. And now they open anew, though not by far one of the earliest pages in the history of mankind. And yet how far back do those civilizations go in comparison with the oldest? And even them, history is shy to accept. Archaeology has sufficiently demonstrated that the memory of man runs back vastly further than history has been willing to accept, and the sacred records of once mighty nations preserved by their heirs are still more worthy of trust. We speak of civilizations of the anti- glacial period ; and (not only in the minds of the vulgar and the profane but even in the opinion of the highly learned geologist) the claim sounds preposterous. What would you say then to our affirmation that the Chinese—I now speak of the inland, the trueChinaman, not of the hybrid mixture between the fourth and thefifth Races now occupying the throne—the aborigines, who belongin their unallied nationality wholly to the highest and last branchof the fourth Race, reached their highest civilization when the fifthhad hardly appeared in Asia, and that its first off-shoot was yet athing of the future. When was it? Calculate. You cannotthink that we, who have such tremendous odds against the accept-ance of our doctrine would deliberately go on inventing Races andsub-races (in the opinion of Mr. Hume) were not they a matter ofundeniable fact. The group of islands off the Siberian coast dis-covered by Nordeneskjol of the '* Vega " was found strewn withfossils of horses, sheep, oxen, etc., among gigantic bones ofelephants, mammoths, rhinoceroses and other monsters belongingto periods when man—says your science—had not yet made hisappearance on earth. How came horses and sheep to be foundin company with the huge ** anti-diluvians "? The horse, wearetaught in schools is quite a modern invention of nature, and noman ever saw its pedactyl ancestor. The group of the Siberianislands may give the lie to the comfortable theory. The regionnow locked in the fetters of eternal winter uninhabited by man—that most fragile of animals,—will be very soon proved to havehad not only a tropical climate—something your science knowsand does not dispute, —but having been likewise the seat of oneof the most ancient civilisations of that fourth race, whose highestrelics now we find in the degenerate Chinaman, and whose lowestare hopelessly (for the profane scientist) intermixed with theremnants of the third. I told you before now, that the highestpeople now on earth (spiritually) belong to the first sub-race ofthe fifth root Race ; and those are the Aryan Asiatics ; the highestrace (physical intellectuality) is the last sub-race of the fifth—yourselves the white conquerors. The majority of mankind be-longs to the seventh sub-race of the fourth Root race, —the abovementioned Chinamen and their off-shoots and branchlets (Malayans,Mongolians, Tibetans, Javanese, etc., etc., etc.) and remnants ofother sub-races of the fourth—and the seventh sub-race of thethird race. All these, fallen degraded semblances of humanityare the direct lineal descendants of highly civilized nations neitherthe name nor memory of which have survived except in suchbooks as Popalvul and a few others unknown to Science.

(4) To the Miocene times. Everything comes in its appointedtime and place in the evolution of Rounds, otherwise it would beimpossible for the best seer to calculate the exact hour and yearwhen such cataclysms great and small have to occur : All an adeptcould do would be to predict an approximate time ; whereas nowevents that result in great geological changes may be predicted with as mathematical a certainty as eclipses and other revolutions in space. The sinking of Atlantis (the group of continents and isles) begun during the Miocene period—as certain of your continents are now observed to be gradually sinking—and it cul- minated—first, in the final disappearance of the largest continent an event coincident with the elevation of the Alps ; and second with that of the last of the fair Islands mentioned by Plato. The Egyptian priests of Sais told his ancestor Solon, that Atlantis (i.e. the only remaining large island) had perished g,ooo years before their time. This was not a fancy date, since they had for milleniums preserved most carefully their records. But then, as I say, they spoke but of the ** Poseidonis " and would not reveal even to the great Greek Legislator their secret chronology. As there are no geological reasons for doubting, but on the contrary, a mass of evidence for accepting the tradition, Science has finally accepted the existence of the great continents and Archipelago and thus vindicated the truth of one more "fable." It now teaches, as you know that Atlantis, or the remnants of it lingered down to post-tertiary times, its final submergency occurring within the palaeozoic ages of American history ! Well, truth and fact ought to feel thankful even for such small favours in the previous absence of any for, so many centuries. The deep sea explorations—especially those of the Challenger have fully confirmed the reports of geology and palaeontology. The great event—the triumph of our " Sons of the Fire Mist " the inhabitants of ** Shambullah " (when yet an island in the central Asian Sea) over the selfish but not entirely wicked magicians of Poseidonis occurred just 11,446 ago. Read in this connection the incomplete and partially veiled tradition in Isis, Volume I, p. 588-94, and some things may become still plainer to you. The corroboration of tradition and history, brought forward by Donneley I find in the main correct ; but you wall find all this and much more in Isis.

(5) It certainly does, and I have touched upon the subject long ago. In my notes on Mr. Hume's MSS., ** On God "—that he kindly adds to our Philosophy, something the latter had never con- templated before—the subject is mentioned abundantly. Has he refused you a look into it ? For you—I may enlarge my explanations, but not before you have read what I say of the origin of good and evil on those margins. Quite enough was said by me for our present purposes. Strangely enough I found a European author—the greatest materialist of his times. Baron d'Holbach whose views—coincide entirely with the views of our philosophy. When reading his Essais sur la Nature, I might have imagined I had our book of Kin-ti before me. As a matter of course and of temperament our Universal Pundit will try to catch at those views and pull every argument to pieces. So far he only threatensme to alter his Preface and not to publish the philosophy under hisown name. Cuneus cuneutn tradit—I begged him not to publishhis essays at all.

M. thinks that for your purposes I better give you a few moredetails upon Atlantis since it is greatly connected with evil if notwith its origin. In the forthcoming Theosophist you will find anote or two appended to Hume's translation of Eliphas Levi'sPreface in connection with the lost continent. And now, sinceI am determined to make of the present answers a volume—bearyour cross with Christian fortitude and then, perhaps, after readingthe whole you will ask for no more for some time to come. Butwhat can I add to that already told? I am unable to give youpurely scientific information since we can never agree entirelywith Western conclusions; and that ours will be rejected as *' unscientific." Yet both geology and palaeontology bear witness tomuch we have to say. Of course your Science is right in manyof her generalities, but her premises are wrong, or at any rate—very faulty. For instance she is right in saying that while thenew America was forming the ancient Atlantis was sinking, andgradually wasting away ; but she is neither right in her givenepochs nor in the calculations of the duration of that sinking. Thelatter—is the future fate of your British Islands, the first on thelist of victims that have to be destroyed by fire (submarinevolcanos) and water, France and other lands will follow suit.When they reappear again, the last seventh Sub-race of the sixthRoot race of present mankind will be flourishing on ** Lemuria"and "Atlantis" both of which will have reappeared also (theirreappearance following immediately the disappearance of thepresent isles and continents), and very few seas and great waterswill be found then on our globe, waters as well as land appearingand disappearing and shifting periodically and each in turn.

Trembling at the prospect of fresh charges of *' contradictions"at some future incomplete statement I rather explain what I meanby this. The approach of every new '* obscuration " is alwayssignalled by cataclysms—of either fire or water. But apart fromthis, every ** Ring " or Root Race has to be cut in two, so to say,by either one or the other. Thus, having reached the apex of itsdevelopment and glory the fourth Race—^the Atlanteans weredestroyed by water; you find now but their degenerate, fallenremnants whose sub-races, nevertheless, aye—each of them, hadits palmy days of glory and relative greatness. What they arenow—^you will be some day, the law of cycles being one andimmutable. When your race—the fifth—will have reached at itszenith of physical intellectuality, and developed the highest civiliza-tion (remember the difference we make between material and spiriitial civilizations) ; unable to go any higher in its own cycle —its progress towards absolute evil will be arrested (as its pre- decessors in the Lemurians and Atlanteans, the men of the third and fourth races were arrested in their progress towards the same) by one of such cataclysmic changes ; its great civilization destroyed, and all the sub-races of that race will be found going down their respective cycles, after a short period of glory and learning. See the remnants of the Atlanteans,—the old Greeks and Romans (the modem belong all to the fifth Race) ; see how great and how short, how evanescent were their days of fame and glory ! For, they were but sub-races of the seven off-shoots of the " root race." No mother Race, any more than her sub-races and off-shoots, is allowed by the one Reigning Law to trespass upon the prerogatives of the Race or Sub-race that will follow it ; least of all—to encroach upon the knowledge and powers in store for its successor. " Thou shalt not eat of the fruit of Knowledge of Good and Evil, of the tree that is growing for thy heirs " we may say with more right than would be willing conceded us by the Humes of your Sub-race. This * * tree " is in our safe-keeping, entrusted to us by the Dhyan Chohans, the protectors of our Race and Trustees for those that are coming. Try to understand the allegory, and to never lose sight of the hint given you in my letter upon the Planetaries.* At the beginning of each Round, when humanity reappears under quite different conditions than those afforded for the birth of each new race and its sub-races, a '* Planetary " has to mix with these primitive men, and to refresh their memories, and reveal to them the truths they knew during the preceding Round Hence the confused traditions about Jehovahs, Ormazds, Osirises, Brahms, and the tuttu quanti. But that happens only for the benefit of the first Race. It is the duty of the latter to choose the fit recipients among its sons, who are " set apart " to use a Biblical phrase—as the vessel to contain the whole stock of knowledge, to be divided among the future races and generations until the close of that Round. Why should I say more since you must understand my whole meaning; and that I dare not reveal it in full. Every race had its adepts ; and with every new race, we are allowed to give them out as much of our knowledge as the men of that race deserve it. The last seventh race will have its Buddah as every one of its predecessors had ; but, its adepts will be far higher than any of the present race, for among them will abide the future Planetary, the Dhyan Chohan whose duty it will be to instruct or ** refresh the memory " of the first race of the fifth Round men after this planet's future obscuration. En passant, to show to you that not only were not the " races invented by us, but that they are a cardinal dogrna with the LamaBuddhists and with all who study our esoteric doctrine, I send youan explanation on a page or two in Rhys Davids " Buddhism,"—otherwise incomprehensible, meaningless and absurd. It iswritten with the special permission of the Chohan (my Master)and—for your benefit. No Orientalist has ever suspected thetruths contained in it, and—you are the first Western man (outsideTibet) to whom it is now explained.

(6) What emerg-es at the end of all thing's is not only ** pureand impersonal spirit, ' ' but the collective * * personal ' ' remembrances skimmed off every new fifth principle in the long series ofbeing. And, if at the end of all things—say in some million ofmillions years hence, Spirit will have to rest in its pure, impersonalnon-existence, as the One or the Absolute, still there mustbe"some good " in the cyclic process, since every purified Egohasthe chance in the long interims between objective being upon theplanets to exist as a Dhyan Chohan—from the lowest " DevaChanee " to the highest Planetary, enjoying the fruits of itscollective lives.

But what is "Spirit" pure and impersonal per se? Is itpossible that you should not have realized yet our meaning? whysuch a Spirit is a nonentity, a pure abstraction, an absolute blankto our senses—even to the most spiritual. It becomes somethingonly in union with matter—hence it is always something sincematter is infinite and indestructible and non-existent without Spiritwhich, in matter is life. Separated from matter it becomes theabsolute negation of life and being, whereas matter is inseparablefrom it. Ask those who offer the objection whether they knowanything of " life " and ** consciousness" beyond what they nowfeel on earth. What conception can they have—unless naturalborn seers—of the state and consciousness of one's individualityafter it has separated itself from gross earthly body? Whatisthe good of the whole process of life on earth—you may ask them,in your turn—if, we are as good as ** pure " unconscious entitiesbefore birth, during sleep, and, at the end of our career? Is notdeath, according to the teachings of Science, followed by the samestate of unconsciousness as the one before birth? Does not lifewhen it quits our body become as impersonal as it was beforeitanimated the foetus? Life, after all, —^the greatest problemwithin the ken of human conception is a mystery that the greatestof your men of Science will never solve. In order to be correctlycomprehended it has to be studied in the entire series of its manifestations, otherwise it can never be, not only fathomed, but evencomprehended in its easiest form—life, as a state of being on thisearth. It can never be grasped so long as it is studied separatelyand apart from universal life. To solve the great problem one has to become an occultist ; to analyze and experience with it personally, in all its phases, as life on earth, life beyond the limit of physical death, mineral, vegetable, animal and spiritual life; life in conjunction with concrete matter as well as life present in the imponderable atom. Let them try and examine, or analyze life apart from organism, and what remains of it? Simply a mode of motion ; which, unless our doctrine of the allrPervading, infinite, omnipresent Life is accepted—though it be accepted on no better terms than a hypothesis only a little more reasonable than their scientific hypotheses which are all absurd—has to remain unsolved. Shall they object? Well, we will answer them by using their own weapK>ns. We will say that it is, and will remain for ever demonstrated that since motion is all-pervading and absolute rest inconceivable, that under whatever form or mask motion may app>ear, whether as light, heat, magnetism, chemical affinity or electricity—all these must be but phases of One and the same universal omnipotent Force, a Proteus they bow to, as the Great ** Unknown "—(See Herbert Spencer) and we, simply call the •* One Life " the " One Law " and the ** One Element." The greatest, the most scientific minds on earth, have been keenly pressing forward toward a solution of the mystery, leaving no byepath unexplored, no thread loose or weak in this darkest of labyrinths for them, and all had to come to the same conclusion—that of the Occultists when given only partially—namely that life in its concrete manifestations is the legitimate result and conse- quence of chemical affinity ; as to life in its abstract sense, life pure and simple—^well, they know no more of it to-day, than they knew in the incipient stage of their Royal Society. They only know that organisms in certain solutions previously free from life will spring up spontaneously (Pasteur and his Biblical piety not- withstanding)—owing to certain chemical compositions of such substances. If, as I hope, in a few years, I am entirely my own master—I may have the pleasure of demonstrating to you on your own writing table that life as life is not only transformable into other aspects or phases of the all-pervading Force, but that, it can be actually infused into an artificial man. Frankenstein is a myth only so far as he is the hero of a mystic tale ; in nature—he is a possibility ; and the physicists and physicians of the last sub-race of the sixth Race w^ill inocculate life and revive corpses, as they now inocculate small-pox, and often less comely diseases. Spirit, life and matter, are not natural principles existing independently of each other, but the effects of combinations produced by eternal motion in Space ; and they better learn it.

(7) Most undoubtedly I am so permitted. But then comes the most important point : how far satisfactory will my answers apj>ear —even to you? That not even every new law brought to light is regarded as adding a link to the chain of human knowledgeis shown by the ill-grace with which every fact unwelcome forsome reasons to science is received by its professors. Nevertheless, whenever I can answer you—I will trj^- to do so, only hopingthat you will not send it as a contribution from my pen to theJournal of Science.

(8) Most assuredly they have. Rain can be brought on in asmall area of space—^artificially and without any claim to miracleor superhuman powers, though its secret is no property of minethat I should divulge it. I am now trying to obtain permissionto do so. We know of no phenomenon in nature—entirely un-connected with either magnetism or electricity—since, where thereare motion, heat, friction, light, there magnetism and its alter-ego(according to our humble opinion)—electricity will always appear,as either cause or effect—or rather both if we but fathom themanifestation to its origin. All the phenomena of earth currents,terrestrial magnetism and atmospheric electricity, are due to thefact that the earth is an electrified conductor, whose potential isever changing owing to its rotation and its annual orbital motion,the successive cooling and heating of the air, the formation ofclouds and rain, storms and winds, etc. This you may perhaps,find in some text book. But then Science would be unwillingto admit that all these changes are due to Akasic magnetism inces-santly generating electric currents which tend to restore the dis-turbed equilibrium. By directing the most powerful of electricbatteries, —^human frame electrified by certain process, you canstop rain on some given pK>int by making a ** hole in the raincloud," as the occultists term it. By using other stronglymagnetized implements within, so to say, an insulated area—raincan be produced artificially. I regret my inability to explain toyou the process more clearly. You know the effects produced bytrees, plants on rain clouds ; and how their strong magnetic natureattracts and even feeds these clouds over the tops of the trees.Science explains it otherwise, maybe. Well, I cannot help it, forsuch is our knowledge and the fruits of milleniums of observations and experience. Were the present to fall into the hands ofHume, he would be sure to remark that I am vindicating the chargepublicly brought by him against us : ** Whenever unable to answeryour arguments (?) they (we) calmly reply that their (our) rules donot admit of this or that."—Charge notwithstanding, I am compelled to answer that since the secret is not mine I cannot makeof it a marketable commodity. Let some physicists calculate theamount of heat required to vaporize a certain quantity of water.Then, let them compute the quantity of rain needed to cover anarea—say, of one square mile to a depth of one inch. For thisamount of vaporization they will require, of course, an amount of heat that would be equal to at least five million tons of coal. Now the amount of energy of which this consumption of heat would be the equivalent corresponds (as any mathematician could tell you)—to that which would be required to raise a weight of upwards of ten million tons, one mile high. How can one man generate such an amount of heat and energy? preposterous, absurd ! We are all lunatics, and you who listen to us will be placed in the same category if you ever venture to rep^eat this proposition. Yet I say, that one man alone can do it, and very easily if he is but acquainted with a certain ** phys'ico-spiritual'^ lever in himself, far more powerful than that of Archimedes. Even simple muscular contraction is aUvays accompanied with electric and magnetic phenomena, and there is the strongest connection between the magnetism of the earth, the changes of weather and man, who is the best barometer living, if he but knew to decipher it properly ; again, the state of the sky can always be ascertained by the variations shown by magnetic instruments. It is now several years that I had an opportunity of reading the deductions of science upK>n this subject ; therefore, unless I go to the trouble of catching up what I may have remained ignorant of, I do not know the latest conclusions of Science. But with us, it is an established fact that it is the earth's magnetism that produces wind, storms, and rain. What science seems to know of it, is but secondary symptoms always induced by that magnetism and she may very soon find out her present errors. Earth's magnetic attraction of meteoric dust, and the direct influence of the latter upon the sudden changes of temperature especially in the matter of heat and cold, is not a settled question to the present day, I believe.^ It was doubted whether the fact of our earth passing through a region of space in which there are more or less of meteoric masses has any bearing upK>n the height of our atmosphere being increased or decreased, or even upon the state of weather. But we think we could easily prove it; and since they accept the fact that the relative distribution and proportion of land and water on our globe may be due to the great accumulation upon it of meteoric dust; snow—especially in our northern regions—being full of meteoric iron and magnetic particles; and deposits of the latter being found even at the bottom of seas and oceans, I wonder how Science has not hitherto understood that every atmospheric change and disturbance was due to the combined magnetism of the two great masses between which our atmosphere is compressed ! I call this meteoric dust a " mass " for it is really one. High above our earth's surface the air is impregnated and space filled with magnetic, or meteoric dust which does not even belong to our solar system. Science havingluckily discovered, that, as our earth with all the other planetsiscarried along through space, it receives a greater proportionofthat dust matter on its northern than on its southern hemisphere,knows that to this are due the preponderating number of the continents in the former hemisphere, and the greater abundanceofsnow and moisture. Millions of such meteors and even of thefinest particles reach us yearly and daily and all our temple knivesare made of this " heavenly " iron, which reaches us withouthaving undergone any change—^the magnetism of the earth keeping them in cohesion. Gaseous matter is continually addedtoour atmosphere from the never ceasing fall of meteoric stronglymagnetic matter, and yet it seems with them still an open questionwhether magnetic conditions have anything to do with the precipitation t>f rain or not ! I do not know of any " set of motionsestablished by pressures, expansions, etc. , due in the first instanceto solar energy." Science makes too much and too little at thesame time of ** solar energy " and even of the sun itself ; andthesun has nothing to do whatever with rain and very little with heat.I was under the impression that science was aware that the glacialperiods as well as those periods when temperature is ** like thatof the carboniferous age ' ' —are due to the decrease and increaseor rather to the expansion of our atmosphere, which expansionis itself due to the same meteoric presence? At any rate, weaUknow, that the heat that the earth receives by radiation fromthesun is at the uttermost one third if not less than the amountreceived by her directly from the meteors.

(9) Call it a chromosphere or atmosphere, it can be calledneither ; for it is simply the magnetic and ever present order of thesun, seen by astronomers only for a brief few moments duringthe eclipse and by some of our chelas—^whenever they like—ofcourse while in a certain induced state. A counterpart of whatthe astronomers call the red flames in the ** corona " may be seenin Reichenbach's crystals or in any other strongly magnetic body.The head of a man—^in a strong ecstatic condition, when all theelectricity of his system is centred around the brain, will represent—especially in darkness—a f>erfect simile of the Sun during suchperiods. The first artist who drew the aureoles about the headsof his Gods and Saints, was not inspired, but represented it on theauthority of temple pictures and traditions of the sanctuary andthe chambers of initiation where such phenomena took place.The closer to the head or to the aura-emitting body—the strongerand the more effulgent the emanation (due to hydrogen sciencetells us in the case of the flames) ; hence—^the irregular red flamesaround the Sun or the inner corona. The fact that those are notalways present in equal quantity shows only the constant fluctua tions of the magnetic matter and its energy, upon which also depends the variety and number of spots. During p>enods of magnetic inertia the spots disappear, or rather remain invisible. The further the emanation shoots out the more it loses in intensity, until gradually subsiding it fades out; hence—the "outer corona," its rayed shape being due entirely to the latter phenomenon whose effulgence proceeds from the magnetic nature of the matter and the electric energy and not at all from intensely hot particles as asserted by some astronomers. All this is terribly unscientific, nevertheless a fact, to which, I may add another by reminding you that the sun we see is not at all the central planet of our little Universe, but only its veil or it's reflection. Science has tremendous odds against studying that planet which luckily for us we have not : foremost of all—the constant tremours of our atmosphere which prevent them from judging correctly the little they do see. This impediment was never in the way of the ancient Chaldee and Egyptian astronomers; nor is it an obstacle to us, for we have means of arresting, of counteracting such tremours—acquainted as we are with all the Akasic conditions. No more than the rain secret, would this secret—supposing we do divulge it—^be of any practical use to your men of Science unless they become Occultists and sacrifice long years to the acquire- men of powers. Only fancy a Huxley or a Tyndall studying Yogvidya! hence the many mistakes into which they fall and the conflicting hypotheses of your best authorities. For instance : the sun is full of iron vapours—a fact that was demonstrated by the spectroscope showing that the light of the corona consisted largely of a line in the green part of the spectrum, very nearly coinciding with an iron line. Yet Professor Young and Lockyer rejected that, under the witty pretext, if I remember, that, if the Corona were composed of minute particles like a dust cloud (and it is this that we call "magnetic matter") these particles would (i) fall upon the sun's body, (2) Comets were known to pass through this vap>our without any visible effect on them ; (3) Professor Young's spectroscope showed that the Coronal line was not identical with the iron one, etc. Why they should call those objections *' scientific " is more than we can tell.

scientific " is more than we can tell. (i) The reasons why the particles—since they call them so—do not fall upon the sun's body, is self-evident. There are forces co-existent with gravitation of which they know nothing ; besides that other fact that there is no gravitation properly speaking ; only attraction and repulsion. (2) How could comets be affected by the said passage since their ** passing through " is simply an optical illusion ; they could not pass within the area of attraction without being immediately annihilated by that force, of which no vril can give an adequate idea, since there can be nothing on earth that can be compared with it. Passing as the comets do througha ** reflection " no wonder that the said vapour has ** no visibleeffect on these light bodies." (3) The coronal line may not seemidentical through the best " grating spectroscoi>e," nevertheless,the corona contains iron as well as other vapours. To tell youof what it does consist is idle, since I am unable to translate thewords we use for it, and that no such matter exists (not in ourplanetary system, at any rate)—^but in the sun. The fact is, thatwhat you call the sun is simply the reflection of the huge " store-house " of our system wherein all its forces are generated andpreserved ; the sun being the heart and brain of our pigmyUniverse, we might compare its jaculae—those millions of small,intensely brilliant bodies of which the sun's surface away fromthe spots is made up—^with the blood corpuscles of that luminary—though some of them as correctly conjectured by science are aslarge as Europe. Those blood corpuscles are the electric andmagnetic matter in its sixth and seventh state. What are thoselong white filaments twisted like so many ropes, of which thepenumbra of the sun is made up? What—the central part thatis seen like a huge flame ending in fiery spires, and the transparentclouds, or rather vapours formed of delicate threads of silverylight, that hang over those flames—what—but magneto-electricaura—the phlogiston of the sun ? Science may go on speculatingfor ever, yet so long as she does not renounce two or three of hercardinal errors she will find herself groping for ever in the dark.Some of her greatest misconceptions are found in her limitednotions on the law of gravitation ; her denial that matter maybeimponderable ; her newly invented term " force" and the absurdand tacitly accepted idea, that force is capable of existing per se,or of acting any more than life, outside, independent of, or in anyother wise than through matter : in other words that force is anything but matter in one of her highest states, —the last three onthe ascending scale being denied because only science knowsnothing of them ; and her utter ignorance of the universal Proteus,its functions and importance in the economy of nature—magnetismand electricity. Tell Science that even in those days of the declineof the Roman Empire, when the tatooed Britisher used to offer tothe Emperor Claudius his Nazzur of " electron " in the shape ofastring of amber beads—that even then, there were yet menre-maining aloof from the immoral masses, who knew moreofelectricity and magnetism than they the men of science do now,and science will laugh at you as bitterly as she now does over yourkind dedication to me. Verily, when your astronomers speak ofsun matter, turn those lights and flames as ** clouds of vapour"and ** gases unknown to science " (rather) ! —chased by mightywhirlwinds and cyclones—^whereas we know it to be simply magnetic matter in its usual state of activity—^we feel inclined to smile at the expressions. Can one imag^ine the ** sun's fires fed with purely mineral matter "—with meteorites highly charged with hydrogen giving the ** sun a far-reaching atmosphere of ignited ? We know that the invisible sun is composed of that which as neither name, nor can it be compared to anything known by your science—on earth; and that its "reflection" contains still less of anything like ** gases," mineral matter, or fire, though even we when treating of it in your civilized tongue are compelled to use such expressions as ** vapK>ur " and " magnetic matter." To close the subject, the coronal changes have no effect on the earth's climate, though spots have—and Professor N. Lockyer is mostly wrong in his deductions. The sun is neither a solid nor a liquid, nor yet a gaseous glow ; but a gigantic ball of electro- magnetic Forces, the store-house of universal life and motion, from which the latter pulsate in all directions, feeding the smallest atom as the greatest genius with the same material unto the end of the Maha Yug.

(10) I believe not. The stars are distant from us, at least 500,000 times as far as the sun and some as many times more. The strong accumulation of meteoric matter and the atmospheric tremours are always in their way. If your astronomers could climb on the height of that meteoric dust, with their telescopes and havanahs they might trust more than they can now in their photometers. How can they? Neither the real degree of intensity of that light can be known on earth—hence no trustworthy basis for calculating magnitudes and distances can be had,—nor have they hitherto made sure in a single instance (except in the matter of one star in Cassiopeia) which stars shine by reflected and which by their own light. The working of the best double star photometers is deceptive. Of this I have made sure, so far back as in the spring of 1878 while watching the observations made through a Pickering Photo-meter. The discrepancy in the observations up)on a star (near Gamma Ceti) amounted at times to half a magnitude. No planets but one have hitherto been discovered outside of the solar system, with all their photometers, while we know with the sole help of our spiritual naked eye a number of them ; every completely matured sun-star having like in our own system several companion planets in fact. The famous *' polarization of light " test is as about trustworthy as all others. Of course, the mere fact of their starting from a false premise cannot vitiate either their conclusions or astronomical prophecies, since both are mathematically correct in their mutual relations, and that it answers the given object. The Chaldees nor yet our old Rishis had either your telescopes or photo-meters ; and yet their astrono- mical predictions were faultless, the mistakes very slight ones in truth—fathered upon them by their modem rivals—proceedingfrom the mistakes of the latter.

You must not complain of my too long answers to your veryshort questions, since I answer you for your instruction asastudent of occultism my " lay " chela, and not at all with a viewof answering the Journal of Science. I am no man of sciencewith regard to, or in connection with modem learning. My knowledge of your Western Sciences is very limited in fact ; and youwill please bear in mind that all my answers are based upon, andderived from, our Eastern occult doctrines regardless of theiragreement or disagreement with those of exact science. Hence,I say :-

'* The sun's surface emits per square mile, as much light (inproportion) as can be emitted from any body." But what canyou mean in this case by ** light "? The latter is not an inde-pendent principle ; and, I rejoiced at the introduction with a viewto facilitate means of observation—of the ** difraction spectrum;*'since by abolishing all these imaginary independent existences,such as—heat, actinism, light, etc., it rendered to Occult Sciencethe greatest service, by vindicating in the eyes of her modern sisterour very ancient theory that every phenomenon being but the effectof the diversified motion of what we call Akasa (not your ether)there was, in fact, but one element, the causative Principle of all.But since your question is asked with a view to settling a disputedpoint in modern science I will try to answer it in the clearest wayI can. I say then, no, and will give you my reasons why. Theycannot know it, for the simple reason that heretofore they haveinreality found no sure means of measuring the velocity of light.The experiments made by Fizean and Corun known as the twobestinvestigators of light in the world of science, notwithstanding thegeneral satisfaction at the results obtained, are not a trustworthydata neither in respect to the velocity with which sunlight travelsnor to its quantity. The methods adopted by both these French-men are yielding correct results (at any rate approximately correct, since there is a variation of 22'/ miles i>er second betweentheresult of the observations of both experimenters albeit made withthe same apparatus)—only as regards the velocity of light betweenour earth and the upper regions of its atmosphere. Their toothedwheel, revolving at a known velocity records, of course, the strongray of light which passes through one of the inches of the wheel,and then has its point of light obscured whenever a tooth passes—accurately enough. The instrument is very ingenious and canhardly fail to give splendid results on a joumey of a few thousandmetres there and back ; there being between the Paris observatoryand its fortifications no atmosphere, no meteoric masses to impedethe ray's progress; and that ray finding quite a different quality of a medium to travel upon than the ether of Space, the ether between the Sun and the meteoric continent above our heads, the velocity of light will of course show some 185,000 and odd miles per second, and your physicists shout *' Eureka " ! Nor do any of the other devices contrived by science to measure that velocity since 1887 answer any better. All they can say is that their cal- culations are so far correct. Could they measure light above our atmosphere they would soon find that they were wrong.

tmosphere they would soon find that they were wrong-. (11) It is—so far; but is fast changing. Your science has a theory, I believe, that if the earth were suddenly placed in extremely cold regions—for instance where it would exchange places with Jupiter—all our seas and rivers would be suddenly transformed into solid mountains ; the air, —or rather a portion of the aeriform substances which compose it—would be metamorphosed from their state of invisible fluid owing to the absence of heat into liquids (which now exist on Jupiter, but of which men have no idiea on earth). Realize, or try to, imagine the reverse condition, and it will be that of Jupiter at the present moment.

The whole of our system is impyerceptibly shifting its position in space. The relative distance between planets remaining ever the same, and being in no wise affected by the displacement of the whole system ; and the distance between the latter and the stars and other suns being so incommensurable as to produce but little if any perceptible change for centuries and milleniums to come ;—no astronomer will perceive it telescopicaXly , until Jupiter and some other planets whose little luminous points hide now from our sight millions upon millions of stars (all but some 5000 or 6000)—^will suddenly let us have a peep at a few of the Raja<- suns they are now hiding. There is such a king star right behind Jupiter, that no mortal physical Eye has ever seen during this our Round. Could it be so perceived it would appear, through the best telescope with a power of multiplying its diameter ten thousand times,—still a small dimensionless point, thrown into the shadow by the brightness of any planet; nevertheless—^this world is thousands of times larger than Jupiter. The violent dis- turbance of its atmosphere and even its red spot that so intrigues science lately, are due—(i) To that shifting and (2) to the influence of that Raja Star. In its present position in space imperceptibly small though it be—the metallic substances of which it is mainly composed are expanding, and gradually transforming themselves into aeriform fluids—the state of our own earth and its six sister globes before the first Roundi—and becoming part of its atmosphere. Draw your inferences and deductions from this, my dear ** lay " chela, but beware lest in doing so you sacrifice your humble instructor and the occult doctrine itself on the altar of your wrathful Goddess—modern science.

(12) I am afraid not much, since our Sun is but a reflection.The only great truth uttered by Siemens is that inter-stellar spaceis filled with highly attenuated matter, such as may be put in airvacuum tubes, and which stretches from planet to planet and fromstar to star. But this truth has no bearing upon his main facts.The sun gives all and takes back nothing from its system. Thesun g-athers nothing- ** at the poles "—which are always free evenfrom the famous ** red flames " at all times, not only during theeclipses. How is it that with their pK>werful telescopes they havefailed to perceive any such '* gathering- " since their glasses showthem even the " superlatively fleecy clouds " on the photo^sphere?Nothing can reach the sun from without the boundaries of its ownsystem in the shape of such gross matter as '* attenuated gases."Every bit of matter in all its seven states is necessary to the vitalityof the various and numberless systems—^worlds in formation, sunsawakening anew to life, etc., and they have none to spare even fortheir best neighbours and next of kin. They are mothers, notstepmothers, and would not take away one crumb from thenutrition of their children. The latest theory of radiant energywhich shows that there is no such thing in nature, properlyspeaking, as chemical light, or heat ray is the only approximatelycorrect one. For indeed, there is but one thing—radiant energywhich is inexhaustible and knows neither increase nor decreaseand will go on with its self-generating work to the endof the Solar manvantara. The absorption of Solar Forces by theearth is tremendous; yet it is, or may be demonstrated that thelatter receives hardly 25 per cent, of the chemical power of itsrays, for these are despoiled of 75 per cent, during their verticalpassage through the atmosphere at the moment they reach theouter boundary of the ** aerial ocean." And even those rays loseabout 20 i>er cent, in illuminating and caloric power—we are told.What with such a waste must then be the recuperative powersofour Father-Mother Sun? Yes; call it " Radiant Energy " if youwill : we call it Life—all-pervading, omnipresent life, ever at workin its great laboratory, the Sun.

(13) None can ever be given by your men of Science whose" bumptiousness " makes them declare that only to those forwhom the word magnetism is a mysterious agent the suppositionthat the Sun is a huge magnet can account for the production bythat body of light, heat and the causes of magnetic variation asperceived on our earth. They are determined to ignore and thusreject the theory suggested to them by Jenkins of the R.A.S.ofthe existence of strong magnetic poles above the surface of theearth. But the theory, is a correct one nevertheless, and oneofthese poles revolves around the north pole in a periodical cycle ofseveral hundred years. Halley and Handsteen—besides Jenkins —were the only scientific men that ever suspected it. Your question is again answered by reminding- you of another exploded supposition. Jenkins did his best some three years ago to prove that it is the north end of the compass needle that is the true north pole, and not the reverse as the current scientific theory maintains. He was informed that the locality in Boothia where Sir James Ross located the earth's north magnetic pole, was purely imaginary : it is not there. If he (and we) are wrong, then the magnetic theory that like poles repel and unlike poles attract, must also be declared a fallacy ; since if the north end of the dipping needle is a south pole then its pointing to the ground in Boothia—as you call it—must be due to attraction? And if there is anything there to attract it, why is it that the needle in London is attracted neither to the ground in Boothia nor to the earth's centre? As very correctly argued, if the north pole of the needle pointed almost perpendicularly to the ground in Boothia it is simply because it was repelled by the true north magnetic pole when Sir J. Ross was there about half a century ago.

No; our '* Lordships" have nothing to do with the inertia of the needle. It is due to the presence of certain metals in fusion in that locality. Increase of temperature diminishes magnetic attraction, and a sufficiently high temperature destroys it often altogether. The temperature I am speaking of is, in the present case rather an aura, an emanation than anything science knows of. Of course, this explanation will never hold water with the present knowledge of science. But we can wait and see. Study magnetism with the help of occult doctrines, and then that which now will appear incomprehensible, absurd in the light of physical science, will become all clear.

(14) They must be. Not all of the Intra-Mercurial planets, nor yet those in the orbit of Neptune, are yet discovered, although they are strongly suspected. We know that such exist and where they exist; and that there are innumerable planets " burnt out" they say,—in obscuration we say;—planets in formation and not yet luminous, etc. But then ** we know " is of little use to science, when the Spiritualists will not admit our knowledge. Edison's tasimeter adjusted to its utmost degree of sensitiveness and attached to a large telescope may be of great use when perfected. When so attached the ** tasimeter " will afford the possibility not only to measure the heat of the remotest of visible stars, but to detect by their invisible radiations stars that are unseen and otherwise undetectable, hence planets also. The dis- coverer, an F.T.S., a good deal protected by M. thinks that if, at any point in a blank space of heavens—a space that appears blank even through a telescope of the highest power—the tasimeter indicates an accession of temperature and does so invariably ; this will be a regular proof that the instrument is in range with thestellar-body either non-luminous or so distant as to be beyondthe reach of telescopic vision. His tasimeter, he says, ** isaffected by a wider range of etheric undulations than the Eye cantake cognizance of." Science will hear sounds from certainplanets before she sees them. This is a prophecy. UnfortunatelyI am not a Planet,—not even a " planetary." Otherwise I wouldadvise you to get a tasimeter from him and thus avoid methetrouble of writing to you. I would manage then to find myself" in range " with you.

(15) No, good friend; I am not as indiscreet as all that, I leftyou simply to your own reminiscences. Every mortal creature,even the less favoured by Fortune, has such moments of relativehappiness at some time of his life. Why shouldn't you? Yes, it was an x-quantity I referred to. 

(16) It is a widely spread belief among all the Hindus thataperson's future pre-natal state and birth are moulded by the lastdesire he may have at the time of death. But this last desire,they say, necessarily hinges on to the shape which the personmay have given to his desires, passions, etc., during his pastlife. It is for this very reason, viz. —that our last desire maynotbe unfavourable to our future progress—that we have to watchour actions and control our passions and desires throughout ourwhole earthly career. 

(17) It cannot be otherwise. The experience of dying men—bydrowning and other accidents—brought back to life, has cor-roborated our doctrine in almost every case. Such thoughts areinvoluntary and we have no more control over them than wewould have over the eye's retina to prevent it perceiving thatcolour which affects it most. At the last moment, the wholelifeis reflected in our memory and emerges from all the forgottennooks and corners picture after picture, one event after the other.The dying brain dislodges memory with a strong supremeimpulse, and memory restores faithfully every impressionentrusted to it during the period of the brain's activity. Thatimpression and thought which was the strongest naturally be-comes the most vivid and survives so to say all the rest whichnow vanish and disappear for ever, to reappear but in Deva Chan.^No man dies insane or unconscious—as some physiologists assert.Even a madman, or one in a fit of delirium tremens will havehisinstant of perfect lucidity at the moment of death, though unableto say so to those present. The man may often appear dead.Yet from the last pulsation, from and between the last throbbingof his heart and the moment when the last spark of animal heat leaves the body—the brain thinks and the Ego lives over in those few brief seconds his whole life over again. Speak in whispers, ye, who assist at a death bed and find yourselves in the solemn presence of Death. Especially have you to keep quiet just after Death has laid her clammy hand upon the body. Speak in whispers, I say, lest you disturb the quiet ripple of thought, and hinder the busy work of the Past casting on its reflections upon the veil of the future. 

(18) Yes; the "full" remembrance of our lives (collective lives) will return back at the end of all the seven rounds, at the threshold of the long, long Nirvana that awaits us after we leave Globe Z. At the end of isolated Rounds, we remember but the sum total of our last impressions, those we had selected, or that have rather forced themselves upon us and followed us in Deva Chan. Those are all " probationary " lives with large in- dulgences and new trials afforded us with every new life. But at the close of the minor cycle, after the completion of all the seven Rounds, there awaits us no other mercy but the cup of good deeds, of merit, outweighing that of evil deeds and demerit in the scales of Retributive Justice. Bad, irretrievably bad must be that Ego that yields no mite from its fifth Principle, and has to be annihilated, to disappear in the eighth Sphere. A mite, as I say, collected from the Personal Ego suffices to save him from the dreary Fate. Not so after the completion of the great cycle : either a long Nirvana of Bliss (unconscious though it be in the, and according to, your crude conceptions) ; after which—life as a Dhyan Chohan for a whole Manvantara, or else " Avitchi Nir- vana " and Manvantara of misery and horror as a . . . you must not hear the word, nor I pronounce or write it. But " those " have nought to do with the mortals who pass through the seven spheres. The collective Karma of a future Planetary is as lovely as the collective Karma as a . . . is terrible. Enough. I have said too much already. 

(19) Verily so. Until the struggle between the higher and middle duad begins—{'with the exception of suicides who are not dead but have only killed their physical triad, and whose Elemental parasites, therefore are not naturally separated from the Ego as in real death)—until that struggle I say, has not begun and ended, no shell can realize its position. When the sixth and seventh principles are gone, carrying off with them the finer, spiritual portions of that, which once was the personal conscious- ness of the fifth, then only does the shell gradually develop a kind of hazy consciousness of its own from what remains in the shadow of personality. No contradiction here, my dear friend, — only haziness in your own perceptions. (20) All that which pertains to the materio-psychological attri- butes and sensations of the five lower skandhas ; all that whichwill be thrown off as a refuse by the newly born Ego in the DevaChan, as unworthy of and not sufficiently related to the purelyspiritual perceptions, emotions and feelings of the sixth,strengthened, and so-to-say, cemented by a portion of the fifth,that portion which is necessary in the deva chan for the retentionof a divine spiritualized notion of the '* I " in the Monad whichwould otherwise, have no consciousness in relation to objects andsubjects at all—all this ** becomes extinct for ever " : namelyatthe moment of physical death, to return once more, marshallingbefore the eye of the new Ego at the threshold of Deva Chan andto be rejected by It. It will return for the third time jidly at theend of the minor cycle, after the completion of the seven Roundswhen the sum total of collective existences is weighed—" merit"—in one cup, *' demerit " in the other cup of the scales. Butinthat individual, in the Ego " good, bad, or indifferent in theisolated personality,—consciousness leaves us suddenly as " theflame leaves the wick." Blow out your candle, good friend.The flame has left that candle *' for ever " ; but are the particlesthat moved, their motion producing the objective flame annihilatedor dispersed for all that? Never. Relight the candle and thesame particles drawn by mutual affinity will return to the wick.Place a long row of candles on your table. Light one and blowit out ; then light the other and do the same ; a third and fourth,and so on. The same matter, the same gaseous particles—repre-senting in our case the Karma of the personality—will be calledforth by the conditions given them by your match, to produceanew luminosity ; but can we say that candle No. i has not haditsflame extinct for ever? Not even in the case of the " failures ofnature " of the immediate reincarnation of children and congenitalidiots, etc., that so provoked the wrath of C.C.M., can wecallthem the identical ex-personalities ; though the whole of the samelife-principle and identically the same Manas (fifth principle) re-enters a new body and may be truly called a ** reincarnation ofthe personality "—whereas, in the rebirth of the Egos from devaChans and avitchis into Karmic life it is only the spiritual attributesof the Monad and its Buddhi that are reborn. All we can sayofthe reincarnated " failures " is, that they are the reincarnatedManas, the fifth principle of Mr. Smith or Miss Grey, but notcertainly that these are the reincarnations of Mr. S. and Miss G.Therefore, the explanation ; clear and concise (though perhaps lessliterary than you might make it) given to C.C.M. in theTheosophist in answer to his spiteful hit in Light, is not only correct but candid also; and both yourself and C.C.M. were unjustto Upasika and even to myself who told her what to write ; sinceeven you mistook my wail and lament at the confused and tor- tured explanations in Isis (for its incompleteness no one but we, her inspirers are responsible) and my complaint of having had to exercise all my *' ing-enuity " to make the thing plain, for an avowal of ingeniousness in the sense of cunning and craft, whereas ingenuousness—a sincere desire (though very difficult of realization) to mend and clear up the misconception—was meant by me. I do not know of anything since the very beginning of our correspondence that displeased the Chohan so much as that. But we must not return to the subject again.

But what is then *' the nature of the remembrance and self- consciousness of the shell? " you ask. As I said in your note—no better than a reflected or borrowed light. ** Memory " is one thing, and " perceptive faculties " quite another. A madman may remember very clearly some portion of his past life ; yet he is unable to perceive anything in its true light for the higher portion of his Manas and his Buddhi are paralysed in him, have left him. Could an animal—a dog, for instance—speak, he would prove you that his memory in direct relation to his canine personality, is as fresh as yours ; nevertheless, his memory and instinct cannot be called ** perceptive faculties." A dog remembers that his master thrashed him when the latter gets hold of his stick—at all other times he has no remembrance of it. Thus with a shell ; once in the aura of a medium, all he perceives through the borrowed organs of the medium and of those in magnetic sympathy with the latter, he will perceive very clearly—but not further than what the shell can find in the perceptive faculties and memories of circle and medium—hence often the rational and at times highly intelligent answers ; hence also a complete oblivion of things known to all but that medium and circle. The shell of a highly intelligent, learned, but utterly unspiritual man who died a natural death, will last longer and the shadow of his own memory helping—that shadow which is the refuse of the sixth principle left in the fifth—he may deliver discourses through trance speakers and repeat parrot-like that which he knew of and thought much over it, during his life-time. But find me one single instance in the annals of Spiritualism where a returning shell of a Farraday or a Brewster (for even they were made to fall into the trap of mediumistic attraction) said one word more than it knew during its life-time. Where is that scientific shell, that ever gave evidence of that, which is claimed on behalf of the " disembodied Spirit "—namely, that a free soul, the Spirit dis- enthralled from its body's fetters perceives and sees that which is concealed from living mortal eyes? Challenge the Spiritualists fearlessly, I say ! Defy the best, the most reliable of mediums—Stainton Moses for one— to give you through that high dis- embodied shell, that he mistakes for the '* Imperator " of the early days of his mediumship, to tell you what you will havehidden in your box, if S.M. does not know it; or to repeat to youa line from a Sanskrit manuscript unknown to his medium, oranything of that kind. Prohpudor ! Spirits they call them?Spirits with personal remembrances? As well call personal re-membrances the sentences screeched out by a parrot. Why don'tyou ask C.C.M. to test + ? Why not settle his and your mindat rest by sugg-esting- to him to ask a friend or an acquaintanceunknown to S.M. —to select an object the nature of which willremain in its turn unknown to C.C.M., and then see whether +will be able to name that object—somethings possible even to ag-ood clairvoyant. Let the " Spirit " of Zollner—now that he is in the "fourth dimension of space," and has put up an appear-ance already with several mediums—tell them the last word ofhis discovery, complete his astro-physical philosophy. No; Zollner when lecturing- throug-h an intelligent medium, surroundedwith persons who read his works, are interested in them—willrepeat on various tones that which is known to others (not eventhat which he alone knew most probably), the credulous,ignorant public confounding the post-hoc with the propter-hoc andfirmly convinced of the Spirit*s identity. Indeed, it will be worthyour while to stimulate investigation in this direction. Yes; personal consciousness does leave everyone at death ; and wheneven the centre of memory is re-established in the shell. It willremember and speak out its recollections but through the brain ofsome living human being. Hence—

(21) —a more or less complete, still dim recollection of its personality, and of its purely physical life. As in the case of complete insanity the final severance of the two higher duads (7th 6thand 5th 4th) at the moment of the former going into gestation,digs an impassable gulf between the two. It is not even a portionof the fifth that is carried away—least of all 2^ principles as Mr.Hume crudely puts it in his Fragments that go into Deva Chanleaving but i^ principles behind. The Manas shorn of its finestattributes, becomes like a flower from which all the aroma hassuddenly departed, a rose crushed and having been made to yieldall its oil for the attar manufacture purposes, what is left behindis but the smell of decaying grass, earth and rottenness.

(a)    Question the second is sufficiently answered, I believe.(Your second para.) The Spiritual Ego goes on evolving personalities, in which the sense of identity is very complete whileliving. After their separation from the physical Ego, that sensereturns very dim, and belongs wholly to the recollection of thephysical man. The shell may be a perfect Sinnett when whollyengrossed in a game of cards at his club, and when either losingor winning a large sum of money—or a Babu Smut Murky Dass trying- to cheat his principal out of a sum of rupees. In both cases—ex-editor and Babu will—as shells, remind anyone who will have the privilege of enjoying an hour's chat with the illus- trious dis-embodied angels, more of the inmates of a lunatic asylum made to play parts in private theatricals as means of hygienic recreation, than of the Caesars and Hamlets they would represent. The slightest shock will throw them off the track and send them off raving.
(b) An error. A. P. Sinnett is not " an absolutely new invention." He is the child and creation of his antecedent personal self; the Karmic progeny for all he knows, of Nonius, Asprena, Consul of the Emperor Domitian—(94 a.d.) together with Arricinius Clementus, and friend of the Flamen Dealis of that day (the high priest of Jupiter and chief of the Flamenes) or of that Flamens himself—which would account for A. P. Sinnett's suddenly developed love for mysticism. A.P.S. —the friend and brother of K.H, will go to Deva Chan; and A.P.S. the Editor and the lawn-tennis man, the Don Juan in a mild way in the palmy days of ** Saints, Sinners and Sceneries," identifying himself by mentioning a usually covered mole or scar,—will, perhaps, be abusing the Babus through a medium to some old friend in Cali- fornia or London. 

(c) It will find " enough decent material " and to spare. A few years of Theosophy will furnish it. 

(d) Perfectly correctly defined. 

(e) As much as there is of the personality—in A.P.S. 's reflec- tion in the looking glass of the real, living, A.P.S. 

(f) The Spiritual Ego will not think of the A.P.S. the shell, any more than it will think of the last suit of clothes it wore ; nor will it be conscious that the individuality is gone, since that only individuality and Spiritual personality it will then behold in itself alone. Nosce te ipsum is a direct command of the oracle to the Spiritual monad in Deva Chan; and the ** heresy of Indi- viduality " is a doctrine propounded by Tathag^tha with an eye to the Shell. The latter whose bumptiousness is as proverbial as that of the medium when reminded that it is A.P.S.—will echo out : "Of course, no doubt, hand me over some preserved peaches I devoured with such an appetite for breakfast, and a glass of claret!"—and who after this who knew A.P.S. at Allahabad, will dare doubt his identity?; and, when left alone for one short instant by some disturbance in the circle, or the thought of the medium in wandering for a moment to some other person—that shell will begin to hesitate in its thoughts whether it is A.P.S., S. Wheeler, or Ratigan ; and end by assuring itself it is Julius Caesar, 

(g)—and by finally " remaining asleep." 

(h) No ; it is not conscious of this loss of cohesion. Besides, such a feeling in a shell being quite useless for nature's purposes,it could hardly realize something that could be never even dreamedby a medium or its affinities. It is dimly conscious of its ownphysical death—after a prolonged period of time though—that'sall. The few exceptions to this rule—cases of half successfulsorcerers, of very wicked persons passionately attached to Self—offer a real danger to the living. These very material shells,whose last dying thought was Self, —Self, —Self—and to live, tolive ! will often feel it instinctively. So do some suicides—though not all. What happens then is terrible for it becomesacase of post-mortem licanthropy. The shell will cling sotenaciously to its semblance of life that it will seek refuge in anew organism in any beast—in a dog, a hyaena, a bird whennohuman organism is close at hand—rather than submit to annihilation.

(22) A question I have no right to answer. 

{22) Mars and four other planets of which astronomy knowsyet nothing. Neither A, B, nor Y, Z, are known ; nor can theybe seen through physical means however perfected. 

(24) Most decidedly not. Not even a Dhyan Chohan of thelower orders could approach it without having its body consumed,or rather annihilated. Only the highest ** Planetary " can scanit. (b) Not unless we call it the vertex of an angle. But it isthe vertex of all the " chains " collectively. All of us dwellersof the chains—we will have to evolute, live and run the up anddown scale in that highest and last of the septenaries chains (onthe scale of perfection) before the Solar Pralaya snuffs out ourlittle system. 

(25 & 26) . . . ** in which case it "—the ** it " relates tothe sixth and seventh principles, not to the fifth, for the manaswill have to remain a shell in each case ; only in the one in handitwill have no time to visit mediums : for it begins sinking downtothe eighth sphere almost immediately. *' Then and there " in theeternity may be a mighty long period. It means only that themonad having no Karmic body to guide its rebirth falls intonon-being for a certain period and then reincarnates—certainlynot earlier than a thousand or two thousand years. No, it is notan ** exceptional " case. Save a few exceptional cases in thecase of the initiated such as our Teshu-Lamas and the Boddhisatwas and a few others no monad gets ever re-incarnated beforeits appointed cycle. 

(27) " How does he toss into confusion." ... If insteadof doing to-day something you have to do you put it off till thenext day—does not even this—invisibly and imperceptibly at first,yet as forcibly—throw into confusion many a thing, and in somecases even shuffle the destinies of millions of persons, for good for evil, or simply in connection with a change, —may be unimportant in itself—still a change. And do you mean to say that such an unexpected, horrid murder has not influenced the destinies of millions?

(28) Here we are, again. Verily ever since I had the folly of touching upon this subject—i.e. of harnessing the cart before the horse—my nights are bereft of their hitherto innocent sleep ! —for Heaven's sake take into consideration the following facts, and put them together, if you can. (i) The individual units of mankind remain 100 times longer in the transitory spheres of effects than on the globes ; (2) The few men of the fifth Round do not beget children of the fifth but of your fourth Round. That the '* obscurations " are not Pralayas, and that they last in a pro- portion of I to 10, i.e., if a Ring or whatever we call it, the period during which the seven Root races have to develop and reach their last appearance upon a globe during that Round—lasts say 10 millions of years, (of course it lasts far longer), then the " obscuration " will last no longer than i million. When our globe having got rid of its last fourth Round men and a few, very few of the fifth goes to sleep during the period of its rest the fifth Round men will be resting in their Deva Chan and Spiritual lokas—far longer at any rate than the fourth Round ** angels " in theirs, since they are jar more perfect. A contradiction, and a "lapsus calatn of M."—says Hume; because M. wrote something quite correct though he is no more infallible than I am and might have expressed himself, more than once, very carelessly. ** I want to make out how the next superior Round forms are evolved." My friend, try to understand that you are putting me questions pertaining to the highest initiations. That I can give you a general view, but that I dare not nor will I enter upon details—though I would if I could satisfy you. Do not you feel that it is one of the highest mysteries than which there is no higher one?

(a)    '* Dead " but to resurrect in greater glory. Is not what I say, plain?
(29) Of course not, since it is not destroyed, but remains crystallized, so to say—statu quo. At each Round there are less and less animals—the latter themselves evoluting into higher forms. During the first Round it is they that were the ** kings of creation.'^ During the seventh men will have become Gods and animals—intelligent beings. Draw your inferences. Beginning with the second round already evolution proceeds on quite a different plan. Everything is evolved and has but to proceed on its cyclic journey and get perfected. It is only the first Round that man becomes from a human being on Globe B. a mineral, a plant, an animal on Planet C. The method changes entirely fromthe second Round ; but—I have learned prudence with you ; andwill say nothing before the time for saying it has come. Andnow, you had a volume; when will you digest it? Of how manycontradictions will I have to be suspected before you understandthe whole correctly? 

Yours nevertheless, and very sincerely, 
K. H.